Non-Compete Agreements Must Be Reasonable

Non-Compete Agreements Must Be Reasonable

A recent decision from the North Carolina Court of Appeals underscores an important rule for non-compete agreements: they must be carefully drafted, reasonable, and tied to a legitimate business interest to be enforceable.

In Southeastern Regional Physician Services v. Scott, the Court reviewed restrictive covenants signed by two nurse practitioners. After the individuals left employment, the non-compete provisions prohibited them from “engaging in the practice of Medicine” or providing similar services.

Why the Court Found the Non-Compete Unenforceable
The Court held the restrictions were overly broad and too restrictive—meaning they went further than North Carolina law allows and improperly limited the ability of the employees to continue working in their chosen profession. Importantly, the Court also declined to “blue-pencil”** (rewrite or modify) the agreement to make it enforceable.

This is a critical takeaway for both employees and employers: in North Carolina, a non-compete is not automatically enforceable simply because someone signed it.

What North Carolina Courts Look For in Enforceable Non-Competes
Under North Carolina law, courts evaluate whether a **restrictive covenant** is valid based on factors such as:

– Reasonableness in time
– Reasonableness in scope
– Reasonableness in territory (where applicable)
– Whether the agreement protects a legitimate business interest
– Whether the restraint violates public policy

(“Covenants not to compete are valid and enforceable if they are: “(1) in writing; (2) reasonable as to terms, time, and territory; (3) made a part of the employment contract; (4) based on valuable consideration; and (5) not against public policy.”)

When those requirements aren’t met, the agreement may be found unenforceable.

How This Decision Impacts Employees and Employers
This ruling may affect anyone dealing with non-compete agreements in North Carolina, including:

– **Employees** considering a new job or practice change
– **Health care providers** and licensed professionals impacted by “practice” restrictions
– **Employers** who want to enforce or update restrictive covenants
– Parties facing **threats of enforcement** or litigation after separation

Need Help Reviewing a Non-Compete in North Carolina?
At Brian Elston Law, we review North Carolina restrictive covenants with a focus on practical outcomes and legal strategy. Our employment-law team regularly handles issues involving:

– Non-compete agreements and restrictive covenants
– Separation agreements and employment disputes
– Workplace conflicts and employment-related civil litigation

If you’re being asked to sign a non-compete, already signed one, are changing jobs, or are facing enforcement threats, we can help you understand your rights, risks, and options.

Contact Brian Elston Law

If you have questions about a North Carolina non-compete or another employment law issue, contact Brian Elston Law to discuss what steps to take next.

Recent updates regarding an ongoing Brian Elston Law Federal Case

Recent updates regarding an ongoing Brian Elston Law Federal Case

Recent updates regarding an ongoing Brian Elston Law Federal Case
brian elston march justice

By BRIAN ELSTON LAW

Brian Elston is in the news regarding a Federal Case where in his clients were wrongfully detained and strip-searched.

Quote from the Asheville Citizen Times:

A federal jury has reached a verdict on the first phase of a Buncombe County man’s civil suit who said sheriff’s deputies violated his rights by strip-searching him in a gas station bathroom.

The jury returned a verdict March 23, the second day of deliberation, saying the actions of one deputy, Jeff May, in the 2018 strip search of Marcus Hyatt were not “reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.”

On February 23, 2021 the Asheville Citizen Times covered the news:

The federal case of a Buncombe County man who was handcuffed, strip searched in a gas station bathroom and held for hours before being released is set for a March 8 jury trial.

The movement toward a civil trial for Marcus Hyatt and his girlfriend Ashley Barrett, who said she was also illegally detained in 2018, comes after a Feb. 12, order by U.S. District Court Judge Martin Reidinger.

The full article can be found here, but may require subscription to read:

https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/2021/02/23/trial-set-march-8-asheville-federal-buncombe-county-strip-search-case/4541109001/

On March 17, 2021 the Asheville Citizen Times wrote an article on the impending trial:

Race, a drug dog, body cam footage and the jury’s take on who is filling in the blanks honestly during gaps in video will steer the outcome of a federal civil rights case brought by a Buncombe County man who said sheriff’s deputies violated his rights in a 2018 traffic stop.

The issues loomed large in a jury trial that started March 17 for Marcus Hyatt, a Black man who says white deputies pulled him and his cousin, Brandon Pickens, over without good reason on Jan. 20, 2018. They detained and handcuffed them, then strip searched them in a gas station bathroom before letting them go after three and a half hours.

The full article can be found here, but may require subscription to read:

https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/2021/03/17/strip-search-case-could-hinge-race-dog-bodycam-footage/4742021001/

This case is ongoing with more news to follow.

If you feel you’ve been wrongfully accused or detained, contact Brian Elston Law.